Since starting the process of creating logos, the idea of semiotics has made more sense to me than it previously did. It made sense before but I am beginning to piece all the parts of it together in a better (more complex) and different way.
Through the process that I went through to arrive at a conclusive image for my logo, I used many principles of semiotics. The overall idea of semiotics, which is the study of signs and the production of meaning, was a large piece of the creative idea. I first thought of an idea or object and from that thought of recognizable images that could relate to them. By doing this I was then led to semantics. I had to come up with a relation between the signs that I was coming up with and be sure that they really did signify the idea(s) or object(s) that I was referring to. Once I had done that, I began to notice similar traits in line and shape quality that the images created together, and also how two different ideas or objects could come together to create a recognizable logo without being static or confusing; syntactic. Significance also played a part in that process because I had to then become the “viewer” of the logo rather than the “creator”. I knew what I was creating but would what I was creating get my idea(s) across to the viewer? I also had to consider the logo as being a connotation or denotation. In other words, would it mean, or stand for, something directly (denotation) or just suggest or imply an idea rather than have a literal meaning (connotation). After working through several ideas for my first logo I feel that I successfully observed and applied the many concepts and ideas that make up semiotics.
Alternative Representation - Turn ins
15 years ago
Good, I like how you used your logo process to help explain semiotics.
ReplyDelete